California Proposition 65
California Proposition 65
Compliance with Confidence
Turn Legal Risk into Consumer Confidence with CDX
In today's regulatory environment, robust compliance systems like CDX are becoming business necessities rather than options. By implementing comprehensive chemical management platforms, businesses can not only protect themselves from substantial financial penalties and reputation damage but also create opportunities for innovation and market leadership.
With the right approach, California Proposition 65 compliance can be transformed from a regulatory burden into a sustainable competitive advantage through superior chemical intelligence, proactive compliance management, and strategic decision-making in an increasingly chemicals-conscious marketplace.
CDX Features That Simplify California Proposition 65 Compliance
Proactive Compliance Management
Product Complexity Management
Comprehensive Documentation Repository
Where-Used Analysis
Rapid Regulatory Response
Benefits of Using CDX
CDX simplifies and streamlines regulatory compliance across industries by offering a powerful platform for material data management. It ensures compliance with global regulations, enhances supply chain transparency, and reduces operational risk.
Comprehensive Regulatory Compliance Across Multiple Industries
- CDX supports compliance with major global regulations like REACH, RoHS, SCIP, PFAS, California Proposition 65, EU POPs, TSCA, EU Battery Regulation (2023/1542), and more.
- CDX includes substance lists like AD-DSL, HEDSL, GADSL, RISL, and the IAEG PFAS List, ensuring industry-specific compliance coverage.
Simplified Supply Chain Communication
- Built-in workflows and multilingual communication tools enable seamless data exchange between suppliers and customers.
- Free for suppliers to respond to material data requests, improving data accuracy and response rates.
- CDX enables multi-tier data requests and traceability, reducing manual follow-ups and ensuring a smoother compliance process.
Automated Data Collection and Reusability
- CDX allows for data reuse by linking material declarations (MDS) and supplier inputs across multiple products and customers.
- It includes tools to import/export standardized data (e.g., IPC-1752A, IPC-1754), minimizing duplication and saving time.
SCIP Database Integration
- CDX automates the creation and submission of SCIP dossiers, ensuring compliance with EU Waste Framework Directive requirements.
- It supports ECHA´s API for direct uploads and manages required data such as substance of concern, article identifiers, and material categories.
Risk Mitigation
- Helps prevent product recalls by ensuring accurate tracking of hazardous and restricted substances throughout the product lifecycle.
- Supports early detection of non-compliant materials, reducing regulatory exposure and costly late-stage design changes.
Security & Data Protection
- Adheres to high security standards such as ISO certifications and Oracle-powered cloud infrastructure.
- Ensures secure data storage, controlled access, and compliance with global data protection regulations.
Easy Integration with Existing Systems
- Offers APIs and web services for smooth connection to ERP, PLM, and other enterprise systems.
- Compatible with multiple data formats including IPC, IEC, and IMDS, reducing technical friction.
One Platform - Two Powerful Solutions
Material Data Reporting
Stay ahead of global regulations like REACH, SCIP, and RoHS with CDX´s Material Data Reporting tools. Collect, validate, and share material data across your supply chain with ease. Our advanced features ensure compliance, transparency, and streamlined communication.
Responsible Minerals Reporting
Take control of your conflict minerals compliance with our Responsible Minerals Reporting solution. Designed for regulatory frameworks like the EU Conflict Minerals Regulation and the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act, CDX empowers your team to meet due diligence requirements and drive sustainable sourcing.
California Proposition 65: What You Need to Know
What is California Proposition 65?
California Proposition 65, officially known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, requires businesses to provide "clear and reasonable" warnings before exposing Californians to any of approximately 9000 chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects, or reproductive harm. Despite being a California regulation, its impact extends globally due to California's economic significance as the world's fifth-largest economy, effectively elevating it to a global standard.
What makes Proposition 65 particularly challenging is its unique enforcement structure, which enables private citizens and organizations (sometimes called "bounty hunters") to initiate legal action against non-compliant businesses.
What are the business consequences of non-compliance with Proposition 65?
The impact of non-compliance extends well beyond direct financial penalties. Fines can reach $2,500 per day for each violation, with each non-compliant product potentially constituting a separate violation. In 2022, there were more than 890 Proposition 65 settlements totaling over $26 million, increasing to more than 1,300 settlements by 2024.
Beyond direct financial penalties, the enforcement process itself creates substantial business disruption. Companies facing litigation must redirect significant resources toward legal defense and settlement negotiations, while also risking substantial reputation damage as consumers often interpret violations as indicators of general product safety concerns.
Who is responsible for compliance within the supply chain?
Compliance responsibility flows across multiple entities within supply chains, establishing shared accountability that cannot be easily delegated or avoided. Manufacturers must identify potential chemical exposures in their products, distributors must ensure proper warning information travels with products through the supply chain, and retailers bear responsibility for displaying appropriate warnings at the point of sale. Foreign manufacturers are increasingly being held accountable as well, demonstrating the truly global reach of this California regulation.
Warning label requirements are specific and evolving. Compliant warnings must include a distinctive symbol (black exclamation point within a yellow triangle), the word "WARNING" in capital letters (changing to "CA WARNING" or "CALIFORNIA WARNING" by January 1, 2025), and textual content identifying at least one listed chemical and specifying whether it causes cancer, birth defects, or reproductive harm. Recent regulatory amendments are phasing out short-form warnings that don't identify specific chemicals, with the transition period ending January 1, 2028.
What are Safe Harbor provisions and how do they apply?
Proposition 65 offers businesses "safe harbor" provisions where warnings aren't needed if chemical exposures fall below established levels. However, proving compliance through testing often becomes technically challenging and expensive for many companies to implement effectively.
When dealing with chemicals that lack established safe harbor levels, businesses face the additional burden of demonstrating that warnings aren't necessary, typically requiring expert consultation and detailed exposure assessments. These practical difficulties lead many businesses to take a cautious approach by providing warnings even in situations where they might not be strictly required, especially for products potentially containing listed substances.
This preventative strategy helps businesses avoid potential compliance issues while managing the complex regulatory requirements of Proposition 65.
How can companies turn Prop 65 compliance into a competitive advantage?
With California's economy ranking as the fifth-largest globally and Proposition 65 regulations becoming increasingly stringent, compliance is evolving from simple warning requirements to comprehensive chemical management. Companies using CDX position themselves as leaders in the transition toward safer products and sustainable manufacturing.
Proposition 65 compliance offers a path to stronger supply chains, better product formulations, and increased consumer trust. When finding alternatives to listed chemicals, manufacturers often discover materials with improved performance that also reduce health risks. With CDX as your partner, you can turn regulatory challenges into business opportunities.
What changed regarding Prop 65 labeling requirements in 2025?
The regulatory landscape shifted significantly with amendments that took effect on January 1, 2025. Previously, companies could display generic warnings that simply stated “cancer and reproductive harm” without naming specific chemicals.
Under the new requirements, all short-form warnings must now:
- Identify at least one chemical name.
- Specify which health risk category it falls under: cancer, reproductive toxicity, or both.
Every compliant warning label requires four core components:
- A black exclamation mark inside a yellow equilateral triangle with a black border.
- The signal word “WARNING” in bold capital letters (alternatively: “CA WARNING” or “CALIFORNIA WARNING”).
- Identification of at least one specific chemical from the list triggering the exposure concern.
- A clear statement of whether the chemical poses a cancer risk, reproductive harm risk, or both.
Additional formatting requirements:
- Font size for all label text must be at least 6-point type.
- The warning text cannot be smaller than the largest font used for other product information on the label.
Phase-in timeline:
- Products manufactured before January 1, 2025 may continue using old-style labels until December 31, 2027.
- All new products must comply with the new requirements starting January 1, 2028.
These changes aim to provide consumers with more specific hazard information rather than generic cautions. If your product information appears in multiple languages, your Prop 65 warning must be translated into each of those languages as well. For products sold online, the warning must appear on your website before customers complete their purchase, and then again on the physical product or packaging.
How many chemicals are on the Prop 65 list and how often does it change?
The Prop 65 chemical list is maintained by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and currently contains more than 1,000 substances identified as causing cancer, reproductive toxicity, or both.
This list encompasses diverse chemical categories including:
- Heavy metals like lead and cadmium
- Phthalates commonly found in plastics and electrical components
- PFAS chemicals
- Flame retardants
- Industrial solvents
- Manufacturing additives
OEHHA updates this list at least annually, though additions can occur more frequently throughout the year. Recent additions illustrate the list's evolving nature, while multiple chemicals have been added in recent years for carcinogenic properties.
Each chemical addition includes:
- An effective listing date
- A separate date when warning requirements activate, typically one year after listing
CDX regularly monitors OEHHA's updates and notifies users with an active newsletter subscription when newly listed chemicals could affect your current products. You can then use the Where Use Analysis feature to determine if any California Proposition 65 substances are present in your material data sheets (MDSs).
How should a company approach collecting Prop 65 information from suppliers?
Collecting accurate chemical composition data from your supply chain is foundational to Prop 65 compliance, but many companies struggle with incomplete or delayed supplier responses. A structured supplier declaration process improves data quality significantly.
- Begin by standardizing your requests using industry-accepted formats such as IPC-1752A or IEC 62474, explicitly including the Prop 65 chemical list as a required disclosure field.
- When reaching out to suppliers, start with your direct suppliers (Tier 1), then expand to secondary suppliers (Tier 2 and beyond) for components with higher chemical risk - such as items containing adhesives, resins, plastics, or protective coatings.
- Validate the data suppliers provide by cross-referencing with available testing reports, safety data sheets (SDSs), or third-party audit documentation whenever feasible. This validation step reduces the risk of relying on incomplete or inaccurate supplier representations.
- Use CDX as a centralized repository storing all declarations, test results, communications, and compliance documentation - this creates a defensible record if compliance questions arise later.
Communication matters significantly:
Clearly explain why you need this information and how it protects both organizations from liability. Many suppliers lack deep chemical expertise or familiarity with California regulations, so education reduces compliance friction. CDX streamlines this entire process by automating supplier outreach in multiple languages, allowing suppliers to respond at no cost, validating responses for completeness, and maintaining accessible documentation records for audit purposes.
How do Prop 65 requirements differ for products sold online versus in physical retail locations?
Products sold through internet channels face dual warning obligations that differ from traditional retail. Whether selling directly to consumers online or through e-commerce platforms, you must provide warning information at two distinct points in the purchase process.
- Before customers complete their purchase on your website or the retail platform's website, a clear Prop 65 warning must be visible. This "pre-purchase" warning ensures consumers can review hazard information before committing to the transaction.
- The physical product or its packaging must carry an appropriate warning label meeting all current label requirements. Your company bears responsibility for ensuring both warnings appear accurately even if other companies handle fulfillment or distribution.
If product information (descriptions, instructions, ingredients) appears in multiple languages on your website, your Prop 65 warnings must also be translated into those same languages to ensure all customers receive equivalent hazard information. Companies selling through third-party platforms like Amazon, eBay, or specialty retailers must ensure their warnings propagate through the platform's product pages and reach consumers before purchase completion.
This dual-channel requirement applies regardless of where your business is located—if you ship products to California consumers, you must comply with Prop 65 obligations for online sales.
Which chemicals on the Prop 65 list most commonly affect specific industries?
While the Prop 65 chemical list encompasses over 1,000 substances, certain industries face particular compliance challenges based on their manufacturing processes and material inputs.
Electronics Industry
The electronics industry frequently encounters:
- Lead in solder connections
- Cadmium in batteries and coatings
- Phthalates in cable sheathing
These three chemical categories are critical compliance concerns for computer manufacturers, component suppliers, and electronic device producers.
Furniture Manufacturing
Furniture manufacturers contend with:
- Flame retardants used in foam cushioning and upholstery
- Formaldehyde-based adhesives
These substances are commonly found in seating products, mattresses, and engineered wood materials.
Automotive Suppliers
Automotive suppliers must monitor:
- Lead in various components
- Hexavalent chromium in coatings
- Specific phthalates in interior materials and gaskets
These chemicals affect areas such as vehicle interiors, surface treatments, and electrical systems.
Consumer Products
Consumer product categories ranging from toys to cookware to personal care items commonly involve:
- Metal compounds
- Chemical additives
- Processing residues
These substances often appear on the Prop 65 list and may trigger labeling requirements.
Food Industry
Food-related warnings present distinct requirements:
- Acrylamide in certain cooked foods
- Specific pesticide residues
These chemicals require category-specific warning language that differs from standard product label formatting.
Support Through CDX
Rather than memorizing which chemicals apply to your industry, CDX automates this assessment by analyzing your material composition data and cross-referencing it against the complete Prop 65 chemical list - identifying which products potentially require warnings and which chemicals trigger those requirements.
What documentation should companies maintain to demonstrate Prop 65 compliance?
Maintaining well-organized compliance documentation serves multiple purposes: It provides evidence of compliance efforts if legal challenges arise, demonstrates due diligence to customers and regulators, and creates an audit trail for internal management.
Key documents worth retaining include:
- Supplier declarations stating whether components contain Prop 65 chemicals
- Testing reports or analysis from third parties validating chemical composition
- Safe harbor exposure assessments if your company claimed threshold compliance
- Communication records showing when you requested or received chemical information from suppliers
- Warning label versions with effective dates showing your transition as regulations evolved
- Customer communications explaining warning requirements
Storage and organization tips:
Store these documents systematically - organized by supplier, component, product line, or regulatory requirement depending on your operational structure. Include metadata indicating document dates and version numbers to demonstrate that your compliance reflects requirements active when decisions were made.
This becomes particularly important for regulatory transitions:
If enforcement questions arise regarding products manufactured during regulatory amendment periods, documentation proves your labels reflected the requirements in effect at manufacturing.
How can companies proactively manage Prop 65 compliance across evolving regulatory requirements?
Proactive compliance management transforms Prop 65 from a reactive burden into a strategic advantage by anticipating regulatory changes rather than scrambling to respond to them.
This approach begins with continuous monitoring:
- Stay informed when OEHHA updates the chemical list
- Track when amendments take effect
- Monitor changes to safe harbor thresholds
Regulatory update tracking allows you to assess impacts on your current product portfolio before enforcement issues emerge.
Implement systematic review cycles for your material composition data and supply chain information - rather than waiting for customer inquiries or enforcement notices to prompt action.
When new chemicals are added to the Prop 65 list:
- Evaluate whether your products or components might contain those substances
- Reach out to suppliers for confirmation
This approach helps prevent discovering non-compliance during a customer audit or regulatory investigation.
Many manufacturers use Prop 65 compliance as an opportunity for product improvement, rather than viewing it as purely a regulatory cost. Research from a 2025 study published in Environmental Science & Technology found that:
- 81% of manufacturers treat the Prop 65 chemical list as an authoritative reference for avoiding hazardous substances during product development and sourcing decisions
- 78% indicated the law has prompted their businesses to reformulate products
(Source: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11866925/)
CDX enables this proactive approach through its advanced substance screening and analysis capabilities.
The CDX platform allows you to:
- Collect material data from suppliers
- Automatically analyze that data across your entire product portfolio
- Identify which products contain substances listed on the Prop 65 chemical list
- Search across all products in CDX using basic substance groups
- Screen for specific chemicals to pinpoint compliance risks quickly
The Where-Used Analysis feature traces how substances appear throughout your product lines, ensuring complete visibility across your supply chain.
Do I need a Prop 65 warning if my product contains only trace amounts of listed chemicals?
Not necessarily - Prop 65 warning requirements depend on exposure levels, not merely the presence.
- OEHHA establishes "No Significant Risk Levels" (NSRLs) for carcinogens: daily exposure amounts below which no warning is required.
- For reproductive toxicants, "Maximum Allowable Dose Levels" (MADLs) define the threshold exposure.
- If your product’s foreseeable use would results in exposure below these established levels, warnings technically are not mandatory.
However, the practical challenge lies in proving your product meets these criteria:
- Demonstrating compliance often requires detailed exposure assessments, chemical testing, or expert analysis - each of which can be costly.
- For many chemicals on the Prop 65 list, OEHHA has not established formal safe harbor levels, placing the burden on businesses to prove that warnings are unnecessary.
Given these complexities and liability concerns, many companies adopt a cautious approach:
- They provide warnings even when technical arguments could support safe harbor status, accepting the labeling cost as preferable to the legal and reputational risks of potential non-compliance.
- This preventative strategy reflects the commercial reality that litigation costs and brand damage often exceed the cost of implementing warnings.
CDX supports this approach by maintaining the detailed material composition data necessary to:
- Evaluate safe harbor applicability
- Support exposure assessments if you decide to pursue this compliance pathway
California Proposition 65 -
Understanding Compliance Requirements and Business Impact
California Proposition 65 represents one of the most far-reaching consumer protection laws in the United States, with implications that extend well beyond California's borders.
This comprehensive regulation aims to protect consumers from potential exposure to harmful chemicals, but it also creates significant compliance challenges for businesses around the world.
CDX Updates to Streamline Your California Proposition 65 Compliance
California Updates Proposition 65 Compliance Resources
United States, California: Adds Bisphenol S (BPS) to Proposition 65 List for Male Reproductive Toxicity
Prop 65: California Amends Proposition 65 Warning Options for Acrylamide in Food
Prop 65: Amendment of Short-Form Warning Requirements
Stay informed. Get the latest regulatory updates, compliance insights, and CDX news delivered to your inbox.
Subscribe to our NewsletterExplore the Regulatory Landscape
Get SCIP Ready
Use CDX to report substances of concern and ensure your products meet EU SCIP database requirements.
Comply with REACH
CDX helps you manage and document chemical substances across your supply chain to comply with REACH.
Meet RoHS Standards
Leverage CDX to track and limit hazardous substances in electronics and electrical equipment efficiently.
Manage PFAS Risks
CDX supports your efforts to identify, assess, and manage PFAS usage across evolving global regulations.
Stay CA Prop 65 Compliant
CDX helps you identify and manage chemicals listed under California´s Proposition 65 requirements.
Ensure Responsible Sourcing
Use CDX to collect and validate Conflict Minerals and Extended Materials data across your supply chain.
Optimize Compliance. Stay compliant and competitive in a changing regulatory landscape.
Request a Demo